Joint research from the Rise Research Institutes of Sweden and Dalhousie University, Canada, unveiled that seafood is a source of highly nutritious food with a comparatively low climate impact. Therefore, switching protein sources could significantly reduce emissions while also providing nutritional benefits.

“Food production and our diets represent a large portion of global greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and therefore also major opportunities for improvement,” Friederike Ziegler, associate professor and senior scientist, Department Food and Agriculture at Rise Research Institutes of Sweden, tells NutrtionInsight.

“The work [study findings] could be applied in policymaking in several ways. We show large differences in emissions between different ways a product is produced in – so the same species, but different production methods.”

“Policymaking should favor the lowest impact production methods for each species and move toward the lowest impact species. Dietary advice could shift to the most nutritious and least impact species and production methods, while also considering the nutrition needs of specific populations or population groups.”

Optimizing nutrition and lowering impact

The researchers note that the research can shift seafood production and consumption toward species that optimize nutrition while minimizing climate emissions, both in terms of which species are produced and how.

Such recommendations could be tailored to match particular population groups’ dietary requirements and emission reduction objectives.

The researchers recommend refocusing and tailoring production and consumption patterns toward species and production methods with improved nutrition and climate performance, considering specific nutritional needs and emission reduction goals.

“Both the food industry and consumers can learn a lot from understanding the differences in nutrition content and greenhouse gas emissions between different species and production methods,” continues Ziegler.

“By taking these aspects into account in their choice of products or raw materials – or formulation of products – they could achieve more nutritious and lower emission seafood production and consumption.”

Accessing environmental impact

The findings suggest significant variations in climate performance among seafood species, even within the same species group or species, depending on the production methods.

Increased intake of small pelagic species, wild-caught salmonids and bivalves would improve nutritional advantages while significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with seafood consumption, mainly if replacing red meat.

Ziegler explains the by-catch discarded after seafood fishing: “greenhouse gas emissions is only one dimension of environmental impact. We selected it because it can be quantified for all types of food and along a supply chain.”

“For wild-caught fish, there is often a connection between fisheries that have a high climate impact and high amounts of by-catch and discard as well as other ecosystem impacts (for example, shrimp trawling). That is not to say low-carbon fisheries cannot have high by-catch. It is important to limit the conclusions from a study to its scope.”

Considering if seafood would be a better alternative to plant-based meat substitutes on an environmental scale and health-wise, Ziegler adds: “Seafood contains several nutrients which other research has shown are only found in low amounts or not at all in plant-based foods (for example, selenium and omega 3 fatty acids) and they also seem to be found in more bioavailable forms in animal-based than in plant-based foods.”

Future research for dietary advice

The researchers note that more data is needed on the nutrient content of different species and the climate impact of combinations of species and technologies.

“With more precise and complete data, this kind of assessment could be done as a baseline for giving dietary advice to specific populations or population groups, based on their nutritional needs,” says Ziegler.

“Different nutrients are important in different parts of the world, sometimes, seafood represents an important source of protein, and for women around the world who are iron deficient, seafood can be a good source of this mineral. Dietary advice could be tailored toward these nutritional needs.”

Seaweeds were excluded from this study, but they are a type of food that has gained considerable interest among consumers and the food industry, explains Ziegler.

“We are currently undertaking similar research focusing on seaweeds.”

Although seafood may be more environmentally sustainable, it may be costly. US researchers found that people with low incomes consumed 18% less fish per week than those with high incomes. The researchers proposed targeted policies and interventions to improve seafood consumption.

By Nicole Kerr

Source: Nutrition Insight

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!